SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Bom) 68

R.D.TULPULE
SUKHADEO KRISHNARAO GHATODE – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIBAI DATTATRAVA MOHORIL – Respondent


JUDGMENT-The petitioner is landlord of premises situate at house No. 253, Ward No. 40, in Amravati; in a locality known as Khaparde Bagicha. He purchased this property on the 3rd October 1970 and followed it up by filing this application before the Rent Controller requesting for permission to serve upon the tenant Laxmibai a notice to quit. The ground made out by him in his application is that he, has been living in a rented house in Budhwara Amravati. That he wanted more accommodation and wanted his own house for his residence and convenience. He, therefore, purchased the suit house which he needs bona fide for his residence. These were the bare averments made in the application.

2. The application was resisted by the tenant. According to the tenant, the landlord does not bona fide need these premises for his occupation and residence. He has been in the habit of purchasing properties and selling them. That he had purchased a house in Aurangapura in about 1968 and sold it in March 1970. That in addition he has plots at other places. In short, the case of the tenant was that the landlord was dealing in real property, buying and selling at profit being his business. She seems to sugg


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top