R.D.TULPULE
SUKHADEO KRISHNARAO GHATODE – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIBAI DATTATRAVA MOHORIL – Respondent
2. The application was resisted by the tenant. According to the tenant, the landlord does not bona fide need these premises for his occupation and residence. He has been in the habit of purchasing properties and selling them. That he had purchased a house in Aurangapura in about 1968 and sold it in March 1970. That in addition he has plots at other places. In short, the case of the tenant was that the landlord was dealing in real property, buying and selling at profit being his business. She seems to sugg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.