SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Bom) 116

G.N.VAIDYA
SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED, Sangli – Appellant
Versus
NARHARI BALKRISHNA TULPULE – Respondent


JUDGMENT-The respondent Narhari Balkrishna Tulpule filed on July 28, 1969 in the Court of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangli Special Civil Suit No. 46 of 1969, claiming the following reliefs:-

(1) That the compulsory retirement of the plaintiff-respondent on August 1, 1966 was illegal unjust and inconsistent with the Rules.

(2) That the defendant should be ordered to pay Rs. 16,172 with interest and costs, the particulars of which are as under:-

(i) Rs. 1,400 Notice pay of one month.

(ii) Rs. 6,300 Gratuity in consideration of retirement.

(iii) Rs. 3,262 Compensation for 70 days leave refused.

(iv) Rs. 210 Deducted as house rent from August 1966 to February 1967

at the rate of Rs. 30 p. m.

(v) Rs. 5,000 Consideration for making a hydrolic vacuum pump.

Rs. 16,172

2. The above reliefs were claimed by the respondent-plaintiff, making allegations which may be briefly summarised as under:-

3. The plaintiff claimed to be an expert and experienced engineer, specially requisitioned for erecting the sugar factory of the appellant-defendant and appointed for the same from July 1, 1957. The plaintiff did the major p




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top