G.N.VAIDYA
SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED, Sangli – Appellant
Versus
NARHARI BALKRISHNA TULPULE – Respondent
(1) That the compulsory retirement of the plaintiff-respondent on August 1, 1966 was illegal unjust and inconsistent with the Rules.
(2) That the defendant should be ordered to pay Rs. 16,172 with interest and costs, the particulars of which are as under:-
(i) Rs. 1,400 Notice pay of one month.
(ii) Rs. 6,300 Gratuity in consideration of retirement.
(iii) Rs. 3,262 Compensation for 70 days leave refused.
(iv) Rs. 210 Deducted as house rent from August 1966 to February 1967
at the rate of Rs. 30 p. m.
(v) Rs. 5,000 Consideration for making a hydrolic vacuum pump.
Rs. 16,172
2. The above reliefs were claimed by the respondent-plaintiff, making allegations which may be briefly summarised as under:-
3. The plaintiff claimed to be an expert and experienced engineer, specially requisitioned for erecting the sugar factory of the appellant-defendant and appointed for the same from July 1, 1957. The plaintiff did the major p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.