SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Bom) 144

R.S.PADHYE
JAGANNATH RAMCHANDRA BIYANI – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT-The petitioner was prosecuted for an offence punishable under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code by the Police Sub-Inspector, Police Station Parli-Vaijnath, District Beed, on May 27,1981 on a report by complainant Hiralal Chunnilal Sarda, a resident of Parli- Vaijanath, Taluka Ambejogai, District Beed, contending that he had entrusted about 163 tolas of gold ornaments on account of mutual intimate relationship for the purpose of safe custody to the petitioner. These ornaments belonged to the complainant's wife, son-in-law Narsingdas Maniyar from Gangakhed and relation Chandulal Nawandar from Govardhan. They were entrusted to the petitioner for safe custody on March 5, 1981 in the persence of two witnesses, being Chandulal Nawandar and Khushalchand Gatagat. It was on May IS, 1981 that the complainant was called by the petitioner accused and told that all the ornaments kept by him were stolen. Upon hearing this, it is alleged, complainant Hiralal told the petitioner-accused to make a report to the Police Station. According to the complainant, the petitioner-accused admitted the entrustment of the ornaments in the presence of Hiralal S/o Pakshitam. Baburao s/o Atoba Sangai,


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top