C.S.DHARMADHIKARI
DEVICHAND BALKRISHNA SONVANE – Appellant
Versus
KISAN SHRIPATI DHUMAL – Respondent
2. The plaintiffs filed a suit for possession of the suit premises together with the arrears of rent and costs of the suit. According to the plaintiffs the suit property was purchased by Deu Krishna Sonavane, who was then a minor by his guardian mother Rahi vide the registered sale deed dated 11th June 1921 and all the plaintiffs bad joint interest in the suit property. The plaintiffs then stated that the suit plot is being used for manufacturing even bricks since the last several years and was leased out to different tenants on a monthly basis. The plaintiffs also stated that the bricks are manufactured into ovens installed over the suit property since the beginning. It is their case that the defendants were given the suit plot on lease only for 11 months. According to the plaintiffs they terminated the tenancy of the defendants by notice dated 9
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.