ORAL ORDER :- Heard the learned advocate for the applicant/original petitioners. None present for the respondents, though served.

2. By this review petition, the applicants are seeking review of the order dated 29th January, 2003 passed in the Writ Petition No. 7410 of 2002. The review is sought on two grounds. One is that a new and important fact has been discovered by the applicants which relates to the sale of the property by the respondents to a third party, and secondly that the penalty which could have been imposed under the Stamp Act could not have been more than double the amount of stamp duty to which the documents could have been normally subjected to and in the case in hand, the penalty has been imposed 10 times of the said stamp duty, and both the points were not considered by this Court while disposing of the petition in the order dated 29th January, 2003.

3. As regards the discovery of new and important fact, which is stated to be relating to the conveyance of the property in question in favour of a third party, merely because it is alleged to have come to the knowledge of the applicants subsequent to the passing of the order in question, that itself ipso facto cannot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document