C.L.PANGARKAR
DATTATRAY A s/o RAGHUNATH JOG – Appellant
Versus
RADHABAI w/o LAXMANRAO GHATE – Respondent
2. Radhabai Ghate had instituted Civil Suit No. 955/1971. It came to be decreed on 28-2-1974. The decree was for delivery of possession and recovery of money. Initially two execution applications were filed being RD. No. 280/74 and 931/76. First application i.e. RD. No. 280/74 was dismissed as infructuous. Later the Judgment Debtor i.e. the present applicant filed M.J.C. No. 67/1976 contending that the decree for money could not be executed due to Debt Relief Act, 1975. The M.J.C. was allowed and Execution Application No. 131/76 was dismissed. The Decree Holder/non-applicant filed a revision before this Court being C.RA. No. 339/77. The Civil Revision Application was allowed on 6-91980. After this Civil Revision Application was decided in 1980, the non-applicant/decree-holder Radhabai filed RD. No. 175/81 on 13th April, 1981. It is obvious, therefore, that this RD. No. 175/81 was filed immediately after revision was decided by the High Court. The Decree-holder, howeve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.