SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 2039

D.G.DESHPANDE, R.S.DALVI
SAGIRUDDIN ISRAILUDDIN MISTRY – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

D. G. DESHPANDE, J. :- Heard Mr. Mendadkar for the petitioners. Mr. R. V. Govilkar for the respondent No.5 - who is main contesting respondent.

2. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 10th June, 2005 passed by the respondent No. 2 i.e. Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune, Exhibit 'A' to the petition. They have also further prayed to prohibit respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in relying upon the impugned order dated 10th June, 2005 and further claim declaration that the caste certificate dated 20th November, 1991 issued to the petitioner No. 1 by the respondent No.6 Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, North Solapur, District Solapur, be declared valid, legal and subsisting.

3. This petition which is filed on 5-6-2005 came for hearing earlier before the Division Bench on 21-6-2005, on that day ad interim stay was granted and it was adjourned to 23-6-2005. Then on 23-6-2005 Rule was issued and hearing was expedited and interim stay in terms of prayers (e) and (f) was granted. Then before the another Division Bench on 16-6-2006 grievance was made that even though the petition is expedited it has not been heard so far, and, the









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top