SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1953

P.V.HARDAS, R.M.SAVANT
VASANT RAGHUNATH TUPEKAR – Appellant
Versus
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. M. SA V ANT, J. :- This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 12-3-2001 passed by the Chairman of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the State Board) reverting the petitioner from the post of Chief Engineer to that of Superintending Engineer.

2. The facts necessary for adjudication of the issues raised in the petition are narrated hereinunder:-

The petitioner joined the services of the respondent No. 1 i.e. State Board in August, 1965 as Junior Engineer. The petitioner in due course was promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer, thereafter to the post of Deputy Executive Engineer, Executive Engineer and to the post of Superintending Engineer in the year 1995 and thereafter to the post of Chief Engineer in the year 1999 and was at the relevant time working as Chief Engineer, Aurangabad Zonal Office, Aurangabad. The petitioner therefore reached the highest echelon in service. It is the case of the petitioner that all along he had a clear and unblemished service record. The petitioner was to superannuate on 31-3-2001.

The petitioner while serving as Chief Engineer at Zonal Office at Aurangaba





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top