SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 660

DIPAK MISRA, S.R.WAGHMARE
Rupali Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nil – Respondent


DIPAK MISRA, J.: - Being dissatisfied with and aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 9 - 3 - 2005 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court, Bhopal in R. C. S. No.386A/2004 whereby the Court below has refused to entertain an application preferred under Section 13 - B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for brevity 'the Act') the appellants have preferred the present appeal.

2. The facts in a nutshell are that the marriage between the appellant No.1 and appellant No.2 was solemnized on 16 - 2 - 2002 at Bhopal. After living for a short span of time together the husband and wife realized that they could not sustain the relationship and the incompatibility had come to such incurable state that it was thought apposite to seek divorce by mutual consent rather than to live together and fight a battle royal which was nothing but a sysiphian endeavour to maintain a show of relationship which actually was not. It was felt that the intervention of the parents of both the parties to cement the relationship became an exercise in futility and all efforts to steer and pave the way for relationship in harmony became ineffectual, and discord and dissention remained in constant


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top