SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1729

R.C.CHAVAN
Kirti w/o. Vikas Yeskade – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Bhagiratrao Yeskade – Respondent


JUDGMENT: - This is an application for transfer of Petition No.A - 26 of 2005 from Family Court, Nagpur to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division at Chal1drapur, where applicant's H.M.P. No.24 of 2005 is pending.

2. The applicant seeks transfer on the grounds that she apprehends danger to her life. in case she enters Nagpur. She is dependent on her aged parents. She has no independent source of income and it is not possible for her parents to come at Nagpur to attend each and every date. She has proposed to take admission in B.Ed. course and regular attendance in the college would make it impossible to attend the Court at Nagpur. Her place of residence is about 200 kms. away from Nagpur and journey will cause her a considerable hardship.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent opposes the petition on the ground that except for the ground regarding appearance for B.Ed. course all other grounds are unimportant. Ballarsha is well connected with Nagpur by train as well as road and there should be no difficulty in applicant's attending Family Court at Nagpur which is better equipped to handle her case. He also stated that respondent wants restitution of conjugal rights and will





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top