SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1043

R.BASANT
Mohammed Kutty – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed – Respondent


JUDGMENT: - How is a Magistrate under Section 200 Cr.P.C. "to examine upon oath the complainant and the witnesses present"? What is the role of the learned Magistrate at that stage of the proceedings? Is the Magistrate to function in an activist and dynamic manner to elicit the relevant information from the complainant and his witnesses? Is the Magistrate only to record what the complainant and his witnesses state on oath? These are the interesting questions that arise for consideration in this case.

2. The petitioner went before the learned Magistrate with a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The crime relates to a cheque for Rs.10,000/ - . The complainant was put in the witness stand and his statement was recorded. Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the impugned order reveal what precisely had happened. I extract he same below: -

"2. The sworn statement of the complainant was recorded on 8 - 1 - 96. He has stated that on 20 - 8 - 95 the respondent borrowed an amount of Rs.10,000/ - from him. Thereafter on 21 - 9 - 95 the respondent gave a cheque to the complainant for Rs.10,000/ - which when presented





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top