SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1206

D.D.SINHA, R.C.CHAVAN
Ravindra S/o. Dnyandev Solanke – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


D. D. SINHA, J. : - Heard Shri. Gastgar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Khade, learned counsel for Respondent Caste Scrutiny Committee. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties.

2. The writ petition is directed against order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee dated 18 - 04 - 2006, whereby caste claim of the petitioner, as belonging to Rajput Bhamta (Vimukta Jati), came to be invalidated. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that in the instant case, on earlier occasion, the Caste Scrutiny Committee has issued validity certificate in respect of the real brother of the petitioner viz. Girish dated 22 - 12 - 2004, whereby it is declared that he belonged to Rajput Bhamta (V.J.). Similarly, the Caste Scrutiny Committee has also vide order dated 24th June, 2005 declared that the real sisters of the petitioner viz. Anjali and Manjushree belonged to Rajput Bhamta (V.J.). It is contended that all these validity certificates were placed before the Caste Scrutiny Committee, however, the Caste Scrutiny Committee without taking into consideration these validity certificates, issued by the competent Caste Scrutiny Committee invalidated th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top