S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Taherbhai Taiyebhai Poonawala – Appellant
Versus
G. Hamid Hasan Patel – Respondent
2. The facts and circumstances of the case are stated as follows : The Respondent No.1 was inducted as a tenant in Block No.6, on the ground floor in the building known as Pastakia Mansion, 906, Booty Street, Pune by the then Landlady, Mrs.B.J.Pastakia on terms and conditions of the tenancy agreement dated 1st February, 1969. In the said agreement it was stated that a rent of Rs.60/- per month was payable by the tenant exclusive of electricity charges and education cess and other recoverable taxes from the tenant. The Respondent No.1 was also to pay a sum of Rs.5/- separately by way of monthly water charges in addition to the above. On 27th December,1979, the present Petitioners had purchased the suit building from the then owner Mrs.B.J.Pastakia under a registered sale deed. It is the contention of the Petitioners that subsequently Respondent No.1 fell in arrears of payment of rent fro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.