S.K.SHAH
Devasahayan Soman – Appellant
Versus
Jai Industries – Respondent
2. The Plaintiff is an Indian Inhabitant. The defendant No.1 is the recruiting agent for defendant No.2. Defendant No.2 is a Public Limited Company incorporated in Saudi Arabia.
3. Pursuant to the advertisement in local newspapers on 31st March, 1983 issued by defendant No.1 the plaintiff applied to the defendant No.2 through defendant No.1 for the job with defendant No.2 in Saudi Arabia. The plaintiff was accordingly interviewed by the General Manager Michael Sommer for and on behalf of the Defendants and he was selected for being employed with the defendant No.1 as Assistant Manager at a monthly remuneration of Saudi Riyal 3000 excluding residential accommodation and other perquisites on 29th June, 1983. Initially the defendant No.1 got executed at Bombay an ostensible agreement for Saudi Riyal 1100 for the job of driver. The plaintiff alleges that it was however agreed and understood that the plaintiff would be provided a monthly remuneration of 3000 Saudi Riyals Plus residential accommodation and other perquisites. By letter dated 5th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.