A.K.SIKRI
V. K. Jain – Appellant
Versus
Sharad Jagtiani – Respondent
"However, the same was returned back with memo dated 15.1.1999 of the Bank giving reasons "insufficient funds". Thereafter, notice by UPC was sent by the respondent to the petitioners and according to the respondent since payment was not made even thereafter, the aforesaid complaint was filed. As there is dispute about the service of notice, paras 6 and 7 of the complaint, touching this aspect, are reproduced below:
"6. That thereafter the complainant through his Counsel sent a legal notice dated 23.1.1999 through UPC to the accused persons calling upon them to pay the loan amount of the said cheque of Rs.4,75,000/ - (Rupees four lakhs and seventy-five thousand only) within fifteen days of the receipt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.