JUDGMENT:- This writ petition is filed against the order of the School Tribunal, whereby respondent no.2's termination is set aside and direction to reinstate the respondent is given.

2. The facts, in short, are as follows-

Respondent Sulkan belongs to Scheduled Tribe category. Against the post reserved for that category, she was appointed on probation of two years. It is her case that on 18-12-2000 she had made an application to the Education Officer making allegations that the headmaster of the school had obtained her signatures on the blank papers and her appointment was made after taking money from her; she submits that she rendered good services but inspite of her good performance, her services were terminated by order dated 20-11-2000 w.e.f. 27-12-2000. The respondent raised an objection to the termination order. Hence, another termination order was issued and the services were terminated w.e.f. 22-12-2000.

3. On appeal under Section 9 of the Employees Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act by respondent, the learned judge found that the order was not sustainable in law. Holding so, he allowed the appeal and directed reinstatement. Hence, this writ petition.

4. I have heard

Click Here to Read the rest of this document