SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 460

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Rasiklal Ratilal – Appellant
Versus
Fancy Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT:- The petitioner has filed the present petition for issue of letter of request/ witness summons to Jankalyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. (Respondent no.2) as contemplated under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "Arbitration Act") for production of the original 8 Bills of Exchange, 8 cheques and 8 dishonoured memos as per Exhibit "A" annexed to the petition.

2. The petitioner is a claimant before the Honble Arbitral Tribunal. Respondent no. 1 against whom the claim is made in the sum of Rs.2,69,31,779/- together with interest. The petitioner's basic claims are arising out of these documents. Therefore, an application under Section 27 of the Arbitration Act was filed by the petitioner being Arbitration Petition no.379/ 2006 in this Court. After hearing the petitioner and respondent no.1 by an order dated 29.08.2006 the said petition was allowed in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c). The said order was communicated to respondent no.2 vide letter dated 12.09.2006.

3. On 25.09.2006 representative of respondent no.2-Bank was present through their Advocates and informed to the Honble Tribunal that they have certified copies of the original documents. They h

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top