IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
F.I. REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT,JJ.
Hirabai Dattatray Baabar -PETITIONERS
Versus
Sangli Miraj, Kupwad Municipal Corporation Sangli and other -RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION NO.4137 OF 1999
Decided on:19TH APRIL, 2007
Advocates appeared :
Mr. T.S.Ingle, for the Petitioners
Mr. N.V. Walawalkar for respondent No.1.
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1996 - Section 127 - Notice under, by landowner. - Notice calling information from landowner was served 98 days after receipt of notice under Section 127 by landowner, which time cannot be excluded for extending period of 6 months to take steps.
The petitioners are the owners of land bearing Survey No.469/2B situated at Sangli, admeasuring 1088.12 sq. meters within the limits of the Respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 came into existence since 9th February, 1998. Before that the land was within the limits of the erstwhile Sangli Municipal Council. Respondent No.1 and its predecessors are the Planning Authority for the lands situated within their planning area. In the notified development plan the petitioners land has been shown as reserved for the purpose of "Cold Storage". The development plan of Sangli city was notified on 28th March, 1977 and has come into force with effect from 1st June, 1977. As the respondent No.1 and/or its predecessor in title did not take any steps to acquire the reserved land, the petitioners caused a notice to be served on 4th December, 1987 pursuant to the provisions of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) through their Power of Attorney Holder. The respondent No.1 was called upon the take immediate steps to acquire the land. The notice was received on the same date.
The respondent No.1 by their letter dated 12th March, 1998 asked the petitioners to furnish documents in order to commence the process of acquisition of the land. The documents which were sought, were :-
(1) Map of Survey No.469 showing the shares of yourself and all others.
(2) Copy of Power of Attorney executed in favour of Suresh Vaman Lagu (3) Bill regarding House-tax paid to former Sangli Municipal Council.
It was informed that on annexing the documents to the application, within 7 days of receipt thereof, due and proper action would be commenced, otherwise the notice dated 14th December, 1997 would be treated as withdrawn. The petitioners received the said notice on 20th March, 1998 and by communication of 27th March, 1998 forwarded the necessary information.
2. The respondent No.1 thereafter was pleased to pass a resolution on 1st June, 1998 resolving to acquire the land for Cold Storage and sent the land acquisition proposal to the Collector of Sangli vide their letter dated 26th June, 1998. It may be mentioned that in the notice received by the respondent No.1 on 4th December, 1997 the Power of Attorney holder had mentioned that the property is owned by Vijay Baburao Babaar. The present petition came to be filed on 29th April, 1999.
3. At the hearing of this petition on behalf of the petitioners their learned Counsel has raised the following contention:-Respondent NO.1, it is submitted, has not taken steps to acquire the land in terms of the provisions of Section 127 read with Section 126 of the M.R.T.P. & P.U.L.P. Act within the time prescribed by Section 127 of the Act and consequently the application forwarded by respondent NO.1 to the Appropriate Government on 26th June, 1998 is beyond the prescribed period and as such the property stands de-reserved.
4. A reply was filed by Krishna Madhavrao Shikhare, Assistant Director of Town Planning, Sangli. The facts as averred by the petitioner are not disputed. It is only set out that the Municipal Corporation had resolved to acquire the land within the stipulated time limit from the receipt of the purchase notice. Passing a resolution is part and parcel of the process of land acquisition steps were, therefore, taken on time.
5. A reply has also been filed on behalf of the Respondent No.1 by S.J. Sadamate, Town Planner. It is firstly submitted that the resolution for acquisition was passed on 1st June, 1998 which was within six months as contemplated by Section 127 of the M.R.T.P. Act. Reference is made to the steps taken pursuant to the Commissioner forwarding the application of 26th June, 1998 to the Collector of Sangli pursuant to the resolution of 1st June, 1998. It is not necessary to advert to other facts.
No interim relief was granted by this Court.
However, the petition was expedited.
5. On behalf of the respondent No.1 their learned Coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.