SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 567

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, SWATANTER KUMAR
Naresh Lalchand Bhagchandani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J):- Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

1. The petitioner, an Indian citizen, residing at Lokhandwala Complex, Swami Samarth Nagar, Andheri(West) Mumbai 400058, has approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that the action of the respondents in withholding his passport No E5934818 issued on 24.6.2003 and valid upto 26.6.2013, is arbitrary, contrary to law and is prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner claims that he is involved in export of garments and is a frequent flier to Dubai-Europe and other parts of the world and carries on business in the name and style of Sushilas at Linking Road, Bandra, Mumbai. The petitioner lost his earlier passport being No.484378 dated 22.3.1993 valid upto 21.3.2003. Upon acquiring knowledge of lost of his passport, the petitioner registered a complaint at Khar police station in this regard. The first information report bearing No.632102 dated 11.3.2002 was registered with the said police station.

Thereafter the petitioner applied for fresh passport giving complete details of previous passport issued to him.

3. Respondent no.3 informed the petitioner that th

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top