SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 825

C.L.PANGARKAR
RANJANA GOPALRAO THORAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT :- Rule, heard finally with consent of parties.

2. The revision is filed by accused Smt. Ranjana Thorat, since her application for discharge was rejected by Sessions Judge, Akola.

3. A few facts as can be gathered from F.I.R. may be stated thus.

One Padma was married to accused Baburao Charhate. She has two issues born out of wed-lock. She was being ill-treated by the husband Baburao and his relatives, named in the F.I.R. She had, therefore, lodged a report at Police Station, Hiwarkhed against them. Due to intervention of relatives and for her children she agreed to resume cohabitation with her husband Baburao. In the meanwhile, accused Baburao - the husband - developed physical relationship with the present applicant Ranjana and Baburao went to live with her at Malpura. Ranjana too has two children born from Baburao. Padma, the first wife, was initially kept at Godhi but later she also shifted to Malpura and was living with Baburao, his relatives and Ranjana, the present applicant. It is alleged that she was ill-treated and as a result of which she committed suicide. Her brother lodged report with the police.

4. The Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top