SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 696

A.S.OKA
Bhagirath Shankar Somani – Appellant
Versus
Rameshchandra Daulal Soni – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

1. Considering the controversy involved in these Petitions, by consent of the Advocates appearing for the parties, the same were taken up for final disposal at admission stage. On 3rd May, 2007 I have heard the submissions of Shri Suresh Gole appearing for the Petitioners and Shri Rajesh Shah appearing for the first Respondent.

2. The Petitioners in the Writ Petition No.2810 of 2007 are the original first and second Defendants in S.C. Suit No.4138 of 1978 filed by the first Respondent herein. The second Respondent is the original third Defendant in the said suit. The Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2823 of 2007 is the original first Defendant in S.C. Suit No.4137 of 1978 filed by the first Respondent. The second Respondent is the second Defendant in the said suit. Considering the controversy involved in these Petitions, it is not necessary to serve notice of these Petitions to the second Respondent in both the Petitions.

3. As stated earlier there are two suits filed by the first Respondent. The first suit (S.C.Suit No.4138 of 1978) relates to shed No.44 in Onkar Industrial Estate, Shri Hanuman Silk Mill Compound, Kanjur Marg, Mumbai 78. The second suit (S.C.Suit No.4137 o
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top