SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 690

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.N.PATEL
Reliance Energy Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
MSRDC Ltd. – Respondent


ORAL JUDGEMENT

Dharmadhikari, J

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the decision of the Respondents excluding petitioners from participating as a Bidder for the Mumbai Trans Harbour Link Project. The decision is at Exh. V page 332 of the paperbook. Aggrieved by this action of respondents, the petitioners are praying thus:-

(a) That this Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction to the respondents to issue a request for proposal document for the MTHL Project to first petitioner’s consortium to enable the first petitioners consortium to participate in the second stage of the bidding process and to consider the first petitioner consortium’s request for proposal document for the MTHL Project along with others in the second stage of bidding process on merits. (b) That this Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records of the first petitioner consortium’s case and after looking into the same to set aside and quash the actions, orders and decisions of the respondents in refusing to issue a request f














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top