JUDGMENT:- Heard the learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the respondent-original accused.

2. The State has preferred this application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent in C.R.No.306 of 2003 of Dombivali Police Station. Bail is being sought to be cancelled on merits as well as on the ground that respondent has tried to hamper the investigation and had tampered with the witnesses. The respondent is facing prosecution under Sections 420, 467,478,471 of IPC and also under Sections 35 and 36 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961.

3. The learned Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the applicant on the ground that his custody was not required. It appears that the learned Sessions Judge was erroneously influenced by the fact that the respondent has published various books and many awards were conferred on him and he had participated in many conferences: As far as the aspect of publication of books is concerned, the extinct from one of the books i.e. "Cancervaril Sanjivani" written by the respondent and published on 04-12-1993 has been produced wherein the respondent claims that he has cured 60 female patients of "cancer of p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document