R.C.CHAVAN
Bhaya @ Raju s/o. Shankar Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. Facts, which led to the appellant's prosecution, are as under :
The appellant, along with absconding accused Anil Paunipagar, were prosecuted by the State for their involvement in organised crime in Nagpur. On 28-6-2001, When Ashok Moudekar was in his shop at 6.30 p.m., the appellant, a member of gang of Anil Paunipagar, entered his shop and started threatening Ashok. He demanded that Ashok should pay him Rs.1,000/- by way of Khandani (protection money). The appellant threatened Ashok that if the demand is not fulfilled, then the appellant and other members of the gang will cause hurt to Ashok and his servants. On receipt of the complaint of Ashok, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.