S.R.DONGAONKAR
Ravindra s/o Bapunath Tayade – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Please provide the specific legal document content (replace {content} with the actual text) so I can extract and summarize the key points with proper references as instructed.
As both these applications, involve common question, they are disposed of by this common judgment.
2] The vehicle bearing registration No. MP-28-A-0949 [Jeep] was belonging to applicant in Criminal Application No.3354 of 2004 and vehicle bearing registration No. MH-31-W- 7791 [pick-up-van] MP 28 A 0949 [Jeep] was belonging to applicant in Criminal Application No.1941 of 2005. They were allegedly transporting the fish collected from Wile Life Area as such same were seized by the Forest Officials. The applicants moved the applications for releasing the said vehicles on their Supratnama before the learned J.M.F.C. Ramtek. He rejected those applications by his orders dated 29.9.2004 and 3.12.2004. The revision applications were preferred against those orders, bearing Criminal Revision No.590/2004, which was decided on 30.10.2004 and Revision 795/2004 which was decided on 15.6.2005, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur. The said revision applications were also dismissed and therefore, the applicants have preferred these applications under section 482 Cr.P.C. to challenge those orders seeking release of the said vehicles on Supratnama till the disposal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.