SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 969

B.H.MARLAPALLE
Sanjeev C. Chavan – Appellant
Versus
Subodh N. Pathak – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mr. Amit J. Pai for the applicant.
Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for State.

P.C.:

1. Heard Mr. Pai the learned counsel for the applicant who is the original complainant in Criminal Case No. 1470/S/2002 filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 43rd Court, Borivali, Mumbai for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The said complaint has been dismissed and the accused came to be acquitted from the offence punishable under Section 138 of the said Act as per the order dated 5/3/2004. Hence, this application for special leave to appeal under Section 387(4) of Cr.P.C.

2. As per the complainant he had worked with the coaching classes run by the accused and after putting in about 8 to 10 years of association they decided to separate and in consideration by way of goodwill an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- was agreed to be paid to him by the accused. An amount of Rs.30,000/- was paid in cash and two cheques, one for Rs.1,25,000/- and the second for Rs.91,397/- drawn in his favour were handed over to him by the accused. The first cheque was encashed, but the second cheque was dishonoured and, therefore, he had filed the complaint before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate which came to be dismiss





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top