SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1036

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY (AURANGABAD BENCH)
P. V. HARDAS & S.P. KUKDA Y, JJ.
Ashok s/o Rambhau Ol11ndne & Ors. Appellant
versus
State of Maharashtra Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.786 of 2004 with Criminal Appeal No.225 of 2005
Decided on :31st July, 2007.

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Mr. JOYDEEP CHATTERJI. Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. N. H. BORADE. A.P .P. for Respondent Stare.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of credible and reliable testimony in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the impact of inconsistencies and delays in the prosecution's case.

Headnote:

I.P.C. - Conviction under section 302 read with sections 149, 147, 148, 149, 326 read with sections 149, 324 read with Section 149 and 504 read with section 149 - Summary of Acts and Sections: I.P.C. sections 302, 149, 147, 148, 326, 324, 504 - The court analyzed the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and found that no reliance could be placed on their testimony, leading to the acquittal of the appellants.

Fact of the Case:

The incident involved an assault on the deceased and his wife by the appellants, leading to the death of the deceased. The prosecution witnesses provided testimony regarding the incident and the injuries sustained.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that no reliance could be placed on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses due to the delay in lodging the report, lack of explanation for the delay, and inconsistencies in their statements. As a result, the appellants were acquitted of the charges.

Issues: The key issue revolved around the credibility of the prosecution witnesses and the reliability of their testimony in establishing the guilt of the appellants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of credibility in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, particularly due to the delay in lodging the report, inconsistencies in their statements, and the absence of a nexus between the recovery of weapons and the injuries sustained by the deceased.

Final Decision: The court acquitted the appellants of the charges and ordered the refund of any paid fines, as well as the release of the appellants from jail if not wanted in any other case.

Judgment

P.V. HARDAS, J. :- The appellants in these two appeals who stand convicted for offence punishable under section 302 read with sections 149 of the I.P.C., 147, 148, 323 read with Section 149 and 504 of I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to each pay a fine of Rs.100/- with a default stipulation of undergoing further R.I. for six months, R.I. for two years and to each pay a fine of Rs. 100/ - with a default condition of undergoing further R.I. for two months, R.I. for three years and each to pay a fine of Rs.100/-, in default of payment of fine to suffer further R.I. for three months, R.I. for one year and fine of Rs.100/each in default of payment of fine to undergo further R.I, for three months, and R.I, for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- each in default of payment of fine to undergo further R.I, for three months, respectively by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, by judgment dated 30-11-2004, in Sessions Case No.48 of 2004, by these appeals question the correctness of their conviction and sentence. Since both these appeals at the behest of original accused challenge their conviction, both these appeals are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Such of the facts as are necessary for the decision of this appeal may briefly be stated thus: P.W.9 P.I. Amrut Deshmukh was attached to Gondi Police Station on 7-11-2003.

On that day P.W.1 Kamlabai came to the Police Station and lodged her oral report which was reduced into writing at Exh.28. On the basis of the said report at Exh.28, an offence vide Crime No.106 of 2003, under sections 147,148,149,326,324,504 and 323 of I.P.C. came to be registered. The investigation of the said crime was entrusted to P.W.9 P.I. Deshmukh. Accordingly, on 7-11-2003 he visited the scene of the offence and drew the scene of the offence panchanama in the presence of witnesses at Exh.50. He recorded the statements of P.W.1 Kamlabai, P.W.2 Keshav, P.W.4 Sham and others. On 8-11-2003, he received an M.L.C. from the hospital that injured Mahadeo who had been undergoing treatment in the hospital and succumbed to his injuries. Accordingly, section 302 of the I.P.C. came to be added. On 8-112003, he arrested accused Ashok and accused Dnyandeo. On 10-11-2003, he arrested accused Dashrath and accused Sopan. On 13-11-2003, accused Ashok and accused Dnyandeo expressed their willingness, during custodial interrogation to point out the place where the weapons had been concealed by them. Accordingly, in the presence of panch witness, memorandum at Exh.37 came to be recorded. Accordingly accused Ashok took the police and the panch in a police jeep to his village and produced an axe from his house which came to be seized in the presence of panch witnesses as per panchanama at Exh.38. Accused Dnyandeo then made a statement before the panch witnesses that he would point out the place where the stick was hidden. The statement of accused Dnyandeo came to be recorded as memorandum at Exh.39. Accused Dnyandeo then took the police and the panch to his village and produced a stick from his house which came to be seized in the presence of panchas as per panchanama at Exh.40. On 15-11-2003, accused Sopan had expressed his willingness, during custodial interrogation, to point out the place where two sticks had been concealed by him. Accordingly, his memorandum at Exh.41 came to be drawn in the presence of panchas. Accused Sopan then took the police and the panch to his village and produced two sticks from his house which came to be seized vide panchanama at Exh.42. On 20-11-2003, P.W.9 P.I. Deshmukh arrested accused Bhaskar and Madhukar. On 24-11-2003, accused Bhaskar expressed his willingness to point out the place where an axe had been concealed. Accordingly, a memorandum at Exh.43 came to be drawn in the presence of witnesses. Accused Bhaskar then took the police and panch to his house and produced an axe which came to be seized in the presence of panchas vide panchanama at Exh.44. On the sa






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top