Rule.

2. Returnable forthwith.

3. Heard finally with consent of parties.

4. Both these applications can be decided together since both the applicants seek to quash the same F.I.R. for which Crime No.3330/07 is registered against them Application No.867/07 is filed by Kiran while application No.1599/07 is filed by Vimalabai Madura.

5. A few facts may be stated thus: One Soloman owned a house. Applicant Kiran is the daughter-in-law while applicant Vimala is the married daughter of Soloman. It appears that Soloman before his death had executed gift deeds in favour of grand sons i.e. son of Kiran and also in favour of Vimala. It also appears that he had executed a will. Both Kiran and Vimala appear to have instituted civil suits against each other and they are pending.

There were in all 4 separate electric meters in the said house. It is alleged that all of them were got transferred in the name of Petitioner Kiran but it appears that out of those 4 meters only one is in use and supply through other three meters is disconnected.

6. Due to the several complaints made by petitioner Kiran's husband the meter in question was checked by the staff of the Electricity Distribution Company