SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 849

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, D.G.KARNIK
Govindbhai Dayal Mange – Appellant
Versus
Vijaykumar Balkishan Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Ms K.C. Nichani for the Appellant.
Shri H.V. Chande for the Respondent No.1.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per D.G.Karnik, J.):

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 22-6-1999 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court dismissing the appellant’s Notice of Motion No.2023 of 1997, taken out by for setting aside the ex parte decree dated 20-7-1995.

2. The respondent No.1 (for short, the respondent) filed a suit, bearing Summary Suit No.443 of 1995, against the appellant for recovery of loan of Rs.1,00,000/- together with interest, totally amounting to Rs.1,39,496/-. The respondent’s case was that a cheque for Rs.1,00,000/- dated 25-11-1991 issued by the appellant towards repayment was dishonoured. The respondent had thereafter filed a criminal prosecution against the appellant under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. In the said prosecution, the appellant was convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three more months. The order further directed that if the amount of the fine was recovered, Rs. 90,000/- which was then the balance amount due on the Negotiable Instrument as Rs.10,000/- had already bee







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top