J.P.DEVADHAR, B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Koyala Udyog Kamgar Sanghatan – Appellant
Versus
Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited – Respondent
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
1. The challenge in both these Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India is to the action of Respondents/Employer of effecting the recovery of amount of H.R.A. i.e. house rent allowance allegedly paid in excess to Petitioners/Employees. Said recovery is on the ground that revised provision and formula for payment of H.R.A. evolved as per National Coal Wage Agreement VI, hereinafter referred to as NCWA-VI has been implemented with effect from 1/6/2001 and therefore payment of H.R.A. in accordance with NCWA-V from 1/7/1996 till 31/5/2001 on revised basic salary i.e. as revised by NCWA-VI was illegal and unwarranted. Petitioners have prayed for quashing & setting aside of the order as contained in fax message dated 5/3/2003 ordering its recovery. W. P. 2103/2003 is filed by ten individuals. There is also prayer to refund the amount if recovered with interest @ 18% per annum in W. P. 2190/2003. Petitioner therein is a trade union registered under the provisions of Trade Unions Act, 1926. In both these matters while issuing "Rule", interim relief has been refused. It is admitted position that thereafter Respondents
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.