SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 774

D.G.KARNIK, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
SYNTREX CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
RAJKUMAR KESHARDEV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SIMIL PUROHIT, Sophia

D. G. KARNIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgement and order dated 2nd May 2000 passed by a learned Single judge of this Court dismissing the appellant's petition under section 24 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (for short "the Arbitration Act" ).

( 2 ) THE respondent was a member of the bombay Stock Exchange (for short "bse")and was declared as a defaulter on 29th September 1998. The appellant made a claim on the respondent for Rs. 3 lakhs plus interest of Rs. 59,503/- by making a reference to the BSE on 21st December 1998. According to the appellant, he had given to the respondent a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs on account of "vyaj Badla Transactions" which were not repaid by him. As the respondent denied the liability the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent arising out of the claim made by the appellant was referred to an Arbitral tribunal in accordance with the bye-laws of the BSE. By an unanimous award dated 5th january 2002, the Arbitral Tribunal dismissed the reference on the ground that there were no contract notes and that the alleged vyaj Badla Transactions were not done through the Bolt i. e. on the computerised trading system of the BSE




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top