B.H.MARLAPALLE
RAMCHANDRA NATHU GHADAGE – Appellant
Versus
RAJARAM NATHU GHADAGE – Respondent
(a) Was the transfer of the suit from the court of Joint Civil Judge, J. D. to Vth Joint civil Judge, J. D. and passing of the ex parte decree without notice to the appellants? If yes, does this omission render the ex parte decree void ? (b)Does the decision in Regular Civil Suit no. 227 of 1959 bar the present suit either on the ground of res judicata or for any other reason ? (c) Have the appellants been illegally deprived of their right to file written statement ?
( 2 ) THE suit properties are agricultural lands and residential houses and they were mentioned in schedule "a" and "b" to the plaint. Nathu Pandu Ghadage was married to sundarabai and from the said wed-lock, plaintiff no. 1 - Rajaram, son and plaintiff Nos. 2 and 3 daughters were born. Sundarabai died sometimes in the year 1940 and, therefore,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.