SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 638

F.I.REBELLO, R.M.SAVANT
SHRINIVAS GOVIND SAMANT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.A.Kumbhakoni, G.N.SALUNKE, M.P.THAKUR

R. M. SAVANT, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners who are working in the offices of the various courts in District kolhapur, which are under control and supervision of the District Judge, Kolhapur, are seeking cancellation and/or revocation of the orders of recovery, both dated 12. 2. 1996, exhs. 's' and T to the petition and the order passed on the representation of the petitioners dated 21. 8. 1996 and 18. 9. 1996 at Exhs. V and 'y' to the petition. Consequently, the petitioners have prayed for such relief as they would be entitled to if the main reliefs as prayed for by them are granted.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix involved in the above petition is stated thus :

"the petitioners are working as junior clerks in various court offices in the District of kolhapur within the controul and jurisdiction of the respondent No. 4 i. e. The District judge, Kolhapur. At the time when the petition was filed, the petitioners Nos. 1,18 and 21 were working in the office of the respondent No. 4 as Senior Clerks. The petitioners nos. 2, 4 and 22 were working as Stenographers and the petitioner No. 6 was working as Clerk-cum-Stenographer. I













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top