SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1422

S.A.BOBDE
VIJAY K. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
NALINI VARJEEVANDAS SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASPI CHINOY, H.V.Kode, R.A.THORAT, S.A.SAWANT, Sachin Kadan

S. A. BOBDE, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the concurrent findings of both the courts below that the respondents' suit for eviction should be decreed. The courts below have decreed the suit of the respondent-landlord on the ground that the respondent No. 2 Jayaben sub-let the premises to the petitioner in contravention of section 13 (1) (e) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as the "bombay Rent Act". At the outset, it may be noted that the tenant Jayaben through whom the petitioner claims interest had also challenged the decree by filing Writ Petition No. 3099 of 2001 which has been withdrawn on 13. 4. 2007. It may also be noted that earlier the petitioner and Jayaben had filed common Written statement before the trial Court. Thereafter, both the parties withdrew the common written Statement and filed separate Written statement in which Jayaben stated that the petitioner had been inducted by her by giving a table space on a gratuitous basis.

( 2 ) BOTH the courts below have, on the basis of evidence on record, come to the conclusion that Jayaben had unlawfully let out the suit premises to the petitioner. T










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top