SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1645

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
N.V. DABHOLKAR & P.V. KAKADE, JJ.
The Village Grampanchayat, Talegaon and others - Petition
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.6321 OF 2007.
Decided on : 29th NOVEMBER, 2007.

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Shri A.V. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners.
Shri D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for Respondents to 1 to 3.
Shri S.T. Shelke, Advocate for R.No.4.
Shri N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate with
Shri Santosh Bhosale, Advocate for R.No.5.

Headnote:Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Section 4(2)-Consultation of Village Panchayat-While bifurcation-Not taken-Challenged in petition-As it is necessary-Breach of Section 4(2) of the Act-Held-Writ petition allowed.-The provision regarding consultation is not a mere formality, is sufficiently emphasized by the observations of the Division Bench of the High Court as well as the observations of Honourable the Apex Court. On reference of sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the said Act, it is evident that consultation by the State Government is necessary at three levels : (1) Standing Committee (of Zilla Parishad), (2) Gram Sabha i.e. entire population of the village and (3) the Panchayat.

       Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Section 4 - Commencement of code of conduct in election - Collector’s declaration of bifurcation of village and also notification for election - Challenged was due to code of conduct - No bifurcation - Bar created by Government notification on dt. 12.2.04 also placed - Held - Notification was made after commencement of election process hence, vitiated by condition(z) of notification dt. 12.2.04.

ORAL JUDGMENT: {Per Dabholkar, J}:

1. By this petition, the petitioners, who represent the village panchayat Talegaon and who are also members of the said village panchayat, challenge the notification dated 16th August, 2007, No.VPM 2607/CR-4334/PR-4(22) issued by the Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Government of Maharashtra. By the said notification, original revenue village Talegaon, which within its territorial limits, comprises Krishnanagar, was bifurcated into two revenue villages by exercising the powers as conferred by Article 243(g) of the Constitution of India r.w. Section 4 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (Bombay Act III of 1959). The two newly constituted revenue villages are Talegaon and Krishnanagar, both within Chalisgaon tahsil of Jalgaon district. Consequently, the notification issued by the Additional Collector, Jalgaon on 26.10.2007, No. Sasha/gramapa/kavi/85/2007, inviting objections for constitution of wards in the gram panchayat for election of panchayat of Krishnanagar is also sought to be quashed.

2. It is admitted position that the proposal for such bifurcation was initiated by the Group Gram Panchayat Talegaon which comprises within it hamlet (Tanda) Krishnanagar, Talathi had certified the population of Talegaon to be 4,238 and of Krishnanagar to be 2,246. The Block Development Officer had given no objection to the said proposal in view of the fact that village Krishnanagar was one and half Kms. away from Talegaon. During the pendency of the said proposal with the State Government, the State Election Commission had also issued proposal for election process of village Talegaon (erstwhile inclusive of Krishnanagar).

3. It is the contention of the petitioners that the notification is vitiated by two vices- (I) According to the petitioners, the notification is issued after election process for village panchayat Talegaon (Original) had commenced and the Code of Conduct was made applicable. This was in breach of Condition (Z) as incorporated in the Government Resolution No.2603/ prakra.1544/ parra-4(22) dated 12th February, 2004 issued by the Deputy Secretary. A copy of this notification is at Exh.N (paper-book pages 60 to 62) and it is evident that the notification is issued by order and in the name of Governor of Maharashtra. According to Advocate Shri Deshmukh, the conditions in the notification, therefore, have statutory force; (II) The notification is also issued in breach of the requirement of subsection (2) of Section 4 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, which reads thus: . "

4. Declaration of Village:- (1) ....... (2) Where the circumstances so require to include or exclude any local area from the local area of a village or to alter the limits of a village or that a local area shall cease to be a village, then the notification issued in the like manner after consultation with the Standing Committee and the Gram Sabha and the panchayat concerned, at any time, may provide to- (a) include within, or exclude from any village, any local area or otherwise alter the limits of any village, or (b) declare that any local area shall cease to be a village; and thereupon the local area shall be so included or excluded, or the limits of the village so altered, or, as the case may be, the local area shall cease to be a village." . According to Advocate Shri Deshmukh for the petitioners, there has been no consultation with 5 the standing committee of the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon and also with the Gram Sabha of village Talegaon and, therefore, the notification vitiates being in breach of legal mandate and he has, therefore, prayed for striking it down.

4. Rule, made returnable forthwith by mutual consent.

5. So far as first objection is concerned, Advocate Shri Shelke, on instructions, has produced on record a communication from the Addl. Collector, Jalgaon which is taken on record and marked as Exh.X, which indicates that the notification regarding formation of wards for the ele












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top