SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1560

A.B.CHAUDHARI
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Nanuram s/o Mohanlal Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared
Mr. S.C. Mehadia Advocate for the Petitioner.
Respondent in person.

JUDGMENT :

By the present petition, the petitioner-MSRTC has challenged the judgment and order dated 19.12.2006 passed by the Industrial Court in Revision Application No.103 of 2003 confirming the judgment and order dated 20.11.2003 made by the Labour Court, Akola, in Complaint (ULP) No. 155 of 1992.

FACTS :

2. The respondent was working as a clerk on the establishment of the petitioner. Due to his riotous attitude during working time and during the course of departmental enquiry being conducted against one employee, he was served with a charge-sheet and a regular departmental enquiry was held in which he was found guilty and consequently on 28.2.1990 he was dismissed from service.

3. The respondent filed a complaint before the Labour Court, Akola, questioning his dismissal from service. On the preliminary issue, Labour Court held that the enquiry held against the complainant was not fair and proper and evidence was laid before the Labour Court by the petitioner-employer for proving the misconduct. Finally on 20.11.2003 the Labour Court allowed the complaint and held that the respondent being protected workman and the charges levelled against him bein





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top