ANOOP V.MOHTA
Sardar Hasanbhai Attar – Appellant
Versus
Usman Papamiya Attar Shaikh – Respondent
1. The present Second Appeal is against the order dated 4th May, 2005 passed by the Additional District Judge, Niphad (Nashik) in Regular Civil Appeal No. 258 of 2005, whereby the appeal arising out of the order below Exh. 29 in Regular Darkhast No. 41 of 2001 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Yeola dated 10/03/2005 has been maintained. Respondent No.1 is the decree holder in Regular Civil Suit No. 10 of 1982 by judgment and decree dated 04/09/1995. In appeal No. 139 of 1999, the same decree was confirmed on 25/09/2000. Therefore, execution of the same decree came to be filed on 03/07/2001 by the decree holder against respondent Nos. 2A and 3 (Exh. 29).
2. The warrant under Order 21 Rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short, "CPC") for possession was issued. One Sardar Attar as third party obstructed and therefore, the warrant was returned unserved.
3. Meanwhile, the appellant who is one of the co-sharer of the suit property pending the appeal No. 139 of 1999 as referred above, has filed special suit No. 104 of 2000 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Niphad for separate possession. The same is still pending. Another suit No. 51 of 1999 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.