1. Rule.

2. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the learned counsel for the Parties, matter is taken up for final hearing.

3. To state in brief, the petitioner filed summary suit no.33 of 2006 against the respondents for recovery of certain amount. According to the petitioner, the respondent no.1 is a education trust of which the respondent no.3 is a chairman and the respondent no.2 is a partnership firm of which the respondent no.3 is a partner. The respondent nos.1 and 2 are under the control and management of the Respondent No.3. All activities including financial activities of the respondent nos.1 and 2 are exclusively run and conducted by the respondent no.3. For raising constructions of a huge project at village: Dugaon, Taluka and District: Nashik for the purpose of school and educational academy, Respondent No.3 for the Respondent No.1 approached the Petitioner for purchase of steel. Petitioner according supplied the steel at the site of the defendants from November, 2004 to March, 2005. It was agreed between the parties that bill raised by the petitioner has to be cleared and paid within thirty days and in case of delay