SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1479

J.H.BHATIA
Manoramabai Keshav Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Arun Keshav Joshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Mr.R.S.Apte i/b.M.S. Lagu for petitioner.
Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for respondent no.2.

JUDGMENT :- . Rule.

2. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.

3. The petitioner, who is an old lady aged about 85 years, is admittedly widow of one Keshav Joshi. Respondent no. 1 is her son. She has one more son. She filed Special Civil Suit no. 12 of 2005 seeking declaration of title and perpetual injunction restraining the defendant/respondent no. 1 from interfering in her possession over the disputed property. The property consist of a house bearing city survey no.666/KA situated within the limits of Panvel Municipal Council. Admittedly, this property originally belonged to her husband Keshav Joshi, who died on 9th July, 1987. Keshav Joshi has left behind the petitioner as a widow, two sons, namely, Arun and Vilas and three married daughters. Arun is the defendant. According to the petitioner/plaintiff on 26th October, 1987 the defendant and her other children executed the document whereby they surrendered their rights in the property left behind by her husband and thus she claims to be exclusive owner of the said property. Recently the defendant has started to harass h










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top