PER A.A. SAYED, J.

1. Admit. By consent heard forthwith.

2. This Letters Patent Appeal challenges the impugned order dated 15.4.2002 of the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the writ petition of the appellant, whereby the order passed by the learned Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, dismissing the appellant’s appeal, was confirmed.

3. The case of the appellant before the School Tribunal was that he was duly qualified and was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the secondary section of the school of the respondent-management, which is a government aided school. He was appointed on permanent and clear vacancy with effect from July, 1995. However, he was not issued any appointment letter at the time of his appointment. He was working with the said school till his termination on 1.10.1999. According to the appellant, he was pressurised to give in writing that he was appointed in the school since 14.6.1999, and he was also pressurised to give his signatures on blank letterheads and blank papers without any matter and date. He has further alleged that the management had paid him less salary than what he was entitled to and that when the salary w