SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 1439

VASANTI A.NAIK
SAMEERSINGH SURESHSINGH SURYAWANSHI – Appellant
Versus
SAVIT A SAMEER SINGH SURYAWANSHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For appellant: V. M. Deshpande
For respondent: V. Bapat

ORAL JUDGMENT :-Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Since the second appeal arises out of a matrimonial matter, the parties were put to notice that the matter would be heard finally at the stage of admission.

3. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant husband against the respondent wife challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Achalpur in Regular Civil Appeal No. 66/2001 granting a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in favour of the respondent wife.

4. Few facts giving rise to the second appeal and to the controversy involved therein are stated thus the appellant was married to the respondent on 1-5-1997 according to Hindu rites and customs. The respondent joined the company of the appellant husband and went to the matrimonial house to reside with the appellant. It is the case of the respondent that the appellant treated her well for a few days during the lifetime of her father-in-law. After the death of her father-in-law, the appellant started ill-treating the respondent on the ground that he dislikes her. It is, then, pleaded by the respondent that the appellant's family members always used to ask her to bring money













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top