VASANTI A.NAIK
SAMEERSINGH SURESHSINGH SURYAWANSHI – Appellant
Versus
SAVIT A SAMEER SINGH SURYAWANSHI – Respondent
2. Since the second appeal arises out of a matrimonial matter, the parties were put to notice that the matter would be heard finally at the stage of admission.
3. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant husband against the respondent wife challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Achalpur in Regular Civil Appeal No. 66/2001 granting a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in favour of the respondent wife.
4. Few facts giving rise to the second appeal and to the controversy involved therein are stated thus the appellant was married to the respondent on 1-5-1997 according to Hindu rites and customs. The respondent joined the company of the appellant husband and went to the matrimonial house to reside with the appellant. It is the case of the respondent that the appellant treated her well for a few days during the lifetime of her father-in-law. After the death of her father-in-law, the appellant started ill-treating the respondent on the ground that he dislikes her. It is, then, pleaded by the respondent that the appellant's family members always used to ask her to bring money
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.