SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 498

C.L.PANGARKAR
Nari Shringar Big Bazar, Nagpur – Appellant
Versus
Pantaloon Retailing (India) Ltd. , Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.R.L.Khapre, Advocate for the appellants.
None for the respondents.

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiffs whose plaint was rejected by the trial court and which order was confirmed by the first appellate court.

2. The facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows - The plaintiff no.1 is a Proprietary Firm and No.2 is its owner. He was in search of a good accommodation for running his business. When the building known as 'Land Mark' was under construction, an advertisement was issued by defendant no.1 to offer part of the building for running the business therein. In pursuance to that offer, plaintiff no.2 approached defendant no.1 and had shown his desire to work with defendant no.1 The plaintiff desired to carry out the retail business there under the name and style .Nari Shrungar.. Defendant no.1 agreed to offer 100 sq. ft. area on the second floor of building known as 'Land Second Appeal no.457 of 2007. Mark'. According to that agreement, the plaintiff was allotted 100 sq. ft. of area on the second floor. The plaintiff started his business. An agreement was entered into. On 17/7/2006, a quarrel ensued between the employee of the plaintiff and employee of defendant no.1. The matter was reported to the Polic






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top