C.L.PANGARKAR
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RISOD – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHCHANDRA SHANKARLAL SABU (Dr. ) – Respondent
2. The facts shorn of details are as under –
Plaintiff-respondent No. 1 is the owner of field S. No. 1011 of village Risod, Distt. Washim. There is a Municipal Council at Risod. The Development Authority prepared a Development Plan for said Municipal area of Risod, Survey No. lOll belonging to plaintiff-respondent No. 1 came to be reserved for the weekly market and cattle market by a sanction dated 23-11-1985. On 1-1-1986, the Government issued a Notification reserving the said land for the said purpose and giving out its intention to acquire the said land. In spite of the Notification in respect of the Development Plan, the defendants failed to acquire the said land. The plaintiff, therefore, issued a notice on 5-2-1996 to defendants calling upon them to purchase the land. After receipt of this notice, it is alleged that the appellant-defendant No.3 passed resolution to acquire the said land. On 11-71996, accordingly a pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.