S.RADHAKRISHNAN, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Balasaheb Dhondiram Jagdale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.:- In all the above Petitions, the issue involved is with regard to the special responsibility cast on the Governor of the State of Maharashtra, with regard to development of Vidharbha area. The present area of Vidharbha was earlier included in the erstwhile state of Madhya Pradesh. The demand for the separate state of Vidharbha was duly endorsed by the then Madhya Pradesh Legislature. This was seen as a conflict with the demand made by the Sanyukta Maharashtra Movement in the erstwhile area of Bombay for the creation of a Marathi speaking State.
2. In furtherance of the proposal of a Linguistic Marathi speaking province, the then leaders of Vidharbha and Western Maharashtra entered into an agreement known as the Akola pact for formation of a federal State. Vidharbha still remained part of the erstwhile Madhya Pradesh. After India gained Independence, a State Re-organization Commission was formed under Mr. Justice Fazal Ali. The leaders of the Sanyukta Maharashtra movement solemnly assured the leaders of the then Vidharbha region and other prominent Marathi speaking regions like Marathwada that if a Marathi State was formed. They would ensure the equ
South India Corporation Vs. Secretary, Revenue
Shamsher Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Keshavananda Bharti Vs. State of Kerala
Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam
National Insurance Vs. Laxmi Narain Dhut
Dr. C. Surekha Vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.