K.J.ROHEE, R.C.CHAVAN
Taranjitsingh I. Bagga – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
R. C. CHAVAN, J.:- This appeal by employee takes exception to judgment by the learned single Judge allowing respondent employer's Writ Petition No.4733 of 2005. whereby the learned Judge quashed and set aside order passed by the Courts below granting to the appellant full back wages.
2. The appellant is serving as a conductor with the respondent Corporation. On 20th September, 1992 the bus, on which the appellant was on duty as conductor, Was checked and on the basis of observations made by the Checking Party an enquiry was started against the appellant. According to the appellant, the enquiry was not conducted property and the appellant was dismissed from service by an order dated 8th December, 1994. The appellant filed complaint before the Judge, Labour Court, Amravati under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Lablur Practices Act. The learned Judge, Labour Court held that the appellant was not given opportunity of cross-examining employer's witnesses and, therefore, enquiry was not proper and was not conducted according to the principles of natural justice. He, therefore, allowed complaint, and declared that the respondents
PARA J. K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. K.P. Agrawal. (2007)2 SCC 433 3
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Vs. S. C. Sharma
U.P. State Brassware Corporation Ltd. Vs. Uday Narain Pandey
Allahabad Jal Sansthan Vs. Daya Shankar Rai
U.P. S.R.T.C. Vs. Mitthu Singh
H. S. Chandra Shekara Chari Vs. Divisional Controller, KSRTC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.