N.A.BRITTO
Malini V. Parab @ Prabhu – Appellant
Versus
Prafullakumar R. Deshpande (deceased) – Respondent
2. The parties hereto shall be referred to in the names as they appear in the cause title of the said civil suit. Some admitted facts are required to be stated to dispose of this appeal.
3. The defendants are Owners of a property admeasuring 584 sq. metres surveyed under NO.128 of Curchorem Village in which they constructed a house. The said plot was purchased by the defendant No.1 earlier by Deed of Sale dated 22-2-1982. By virtue of agreement dated 13-1-90, rectified by another agreement dated 22-2-1990, the defendant No.1 (since expired and now represented by his legal representatives) entered into an agreement of sale with the plaintiffs. It is necessary to refer to some of the clauses of the said agreement. By virtue of clauses (1) and (2), the suit plot along with the house was agreed to be sold to the plaintiffs for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, out of which Rs.10,000/- were paid by a cheque, as earnest money. Clause (3) stipulated that the defendants would h
Govind Prasad Chaturvedi Vs. Hari Dult Shastri. AIR 1977 SC 1005 12
Gomanthinayagam Pillai Vs. Palaniswami Nadar
Manjunath Anandappa urf Shivappa Hanasi Vs. Tammanasa
Babu Lal Vs. MIs. Hazari La) Kishori Lal, AIR 1982 SC 818 18
PARA Pushparani S. Sundaram Vs. Pauline Manomani James (deceased)
Pukhraj D. Jain Vs. G. Gopalkrishna
Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Daulat
Smt. Chand Rani (dead) by LRs Vs. Smt. Kamal Rani (dead) by LRs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.