SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 575

C.L.PANGARKAR
Devidas s/o. Udhao Gaurkar – Appellant
Versus
Vithabai w/o. Laxman Dhengale – Respondent


Advocates:
ADVOCATE APPEARED
Mr. B. B. MEHADlYA, Advocate for the Appellants.
None for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :. This second appeal is at the instance of the defendants against whom a decree has been passed by the first appellate court. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendants.


2. The facts giving rise to the appeal arc as follows -

One Arjuna Ragho was a resident of village Padmapur. He had four sons by name Bholu, Zolu, Udhav and Madhav. His widow Laxmibai expIred in the year 1968. Bholu, Zolu and Udhav are also dead. The plaintlff is the daughter of Zolu while the defendants are the heirs of Udhav and Madhav. Bholu died issueless. The pedigree of the family is as follows -


Arjuna


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Laxmibai Bholu(son) Zolu(son) Udhav Madhav

(Window) (deceased) (deceased) (son) (son)

expired dead

On 18-9-68. ------------------------

Vith






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top