RANJANA DESAI, ROSHAN DALVI
Vasudha Gorakhnath Mandvilkar – Appellant
Versus
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. – Respondent
Rule returnable forthwith, as the affidavit of the Respondents is filed and the copies of documents relied upon by the Petitioner as well as the Respondents have been produced in Court.
2. The Petitioner's date of birth IS an issue in this Petition. It is contended by her that she was born on 2nd October, 1950. It is contended by the Respondents that she was born on 2nd October, 1948. The Petitioner has produced and the Respondents have considered the documentary evidence with regard to this date. The Respondents have passed order dated 26th December, 2007 with regard to her date of birth which has been impugned in this Petition.
3, The Petitioner joined the Respondents' service initially as a Clerk-cum-Typist on 18th January, 1971. She contends that she informed Respondent No.1 at the time of joining her service that she was born on 2nd October, 1950. She has filled up a form which is a part of her service record. That form shows her date of birth as 2nd October, 1948 corrected to 2nd October, 1950. The form is type written, correction is handwritten. It is by way of interpolation in the year. Both the parties have relied upon the same document in support
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.