SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Bom) 703

J.H.BHATIA
Jayantilal Deepchand Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Vaishali S. Farne – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S.R. Page, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Y.S. Shinde, APP for the State.

JUDGMENT:

1. Heard Mr Page, learned Counsel for the applicant. None for the respondent No.1. Perused the impugned judgment.

2. The applicant had filed the complaint under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against respondent No.1, who is the Medical Practitioner. It is admitted fact that She had taken loan of Rs.3 lakh from the present applicant for construction of her hospital. According to the complainant, she had repaid the amount of Rs. 2 Lakh by two separate cheques and those cheques were encashed. However, 3rd cheque, which was issued on 16/8/2004 for balance amount of Rs.1 lakh was presented to the bank for encashment but was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds. He issued notice but in spite of that respondent did not make the payment. Thereafter he lodged complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Plea of respondent No.1 was that she had taken the loan at exorbitant interest at the rate of 5% per month and she was paying amount of Rs.15,000/- as interest per month. In the beginning itself, She had given three separate cheques to the applicant, as a security to the loan amount. Out of them, two cheques were presented by him and were encashed. Accord



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top