SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 744

2008 ALL MR (Cri) 2413
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S. R. DONGAONKAR, J.
Anilkumar @ Annu s/o. Puranlal Patel - Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.315 of 2006
Decided on : 6th June, 2008.

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Mr. R P. JOSHI, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. D. B. PATEL, A.P.P. for Respondent State.

Headnote:Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)(c)-Seizure of ganja-Benefit of doubt-Entitled for.-It is not the case of the prosecution that the appellant had any time before had indulged in such activities. No further investigation seems to have been done by the prosecution as to how he could possess such a large quantity of ganja, nor there is any material to show that he was indulged in selling of such contraband either at Nagpur or at some other places. No investigation seems to have been done as to from where he might have brought this ganja. All these things would certainly make appellant entitled for benefit of doubt as regards seizure of ganja from his possession.

JUDGMENT :- By this appeal, the appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (for short N.D.P.S. Act). He has been sentenced for this offence to suffer RI. for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default to suffer RI. for six months by the judgment dated 23-3-2005 in Special Criminal Case No.3812003 by the Judge, Special Court designated under N.D.P.S. Act, Nagpur.

2. Brief facts which are necessary to be stated for the disposal of this appeal, are thus.

Appellant/accused Anilkumar along with one other accused Gopal s/o. Tejilal were prosecuted for the offence under N.D.P.S. Act, particularly Section 20(b)(ii)(c) and Section 29 of the said Act. The prosecution case was that on 6-7-2003, the Investigating Officer, P.I. Abdul Sattar Shaikh Ismail (PW-7) was attached to Narcotic Cell of Crime Branch, Nagpur. At about 6 0' clock in the morning, he left his office for search of persons dealing in narcotics. He had some other police constable with him and also weights and balance and other material, necessary for sealing. When his party was patrolling, he received information that two persons were standing on a road in front of S.T. Stand, Ganeshpeth, Nagpur, and they were in possession of huge quantity of Ganja. Their looks and appearances was also informed. On the basis of that information, he along with other police officials visited the said spot. He noticed two persons, answering the said description received from the informer. The appellant and the other accused Gopal were the same. The appellant was having one suitcase in his right hand and shoulder bag on his left shoulder. One gunny bag was kept on the road in front of accused Gopal. It is alleged that P.I. Abdul Sattar suspected that these persons i.e. the appellant and the other accused Gopal are the same persons who were in possession of Ganja. Panchas were called, namely PW-2 Jagdish Chinchalkar and PW-3 Sunil Bhoyar. It is alleged that thereafter this P.I. Abdul Sattar informed the appellant as to whether his search needs to be taken in presence of the Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate, to which he declined. Then search was taken and Ganja was found in the suit case as well as in the shoulder bag. The same was weighed. It was found 20 Kg. [in the suitcase and the shoulder bag] with appellant Anilkumar. Cash amount of Rs.200 was also found during his personal search. Similar procedure was followed in respect of accused Gopal. In his personal search, nothing was recovered, however, the gunny bag which was found kept in front of accused Gopal, was found containing 20 kg. ofGanja. The P.I. Abdul Sattar then took out the samples from suitcase, shoulder bag and gunny bag of 20 gms., each. They were kept in separate packet and duly sealed. They were sealed with the signature of Panch as etc. Panchanama was prepared. Thereafter all the seized articles i.e. the samples, suit case, shoulder bag and gunny bag containing Ganja were taken to the Police Station Ganeshpeth. They were handed over to the concerned Officer In the Police Station and then P.I. Abdul Sattar lodged report to the police station. PSI Lilhare (PW-5) received the said complaint and those articles including suitcase containing Ganja, one rexine bag and other bag containing Ganja along with samples. The offence was registered. Thereafter, during investigation, the sealed samples were sent to C.A. through PW-4 HC Dhanraj. He deposited the same with C. A.'s Office on 7-7-2003 as per Duty Pass Exh.20. The chemical analysis of the said samples were carried out by PW -1. Gurudeo Ramteke, Assistant C.A., Nagpur. According to him, vide his report Exh.11, Ganja was detected in the said samples. After due investigation, the accused i.e. present appellant and accused Gopal were charge-sheeted for the aforesaid offences.

3. Learned Special Judge (NDPS) Nagpur, framed charge against the appellant and accused


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top